Essay on corruption in judiciary in india
Individuals with the willingness to pay make a significant payment above the official fee and most of these extra payments are made to agents, who act as an intermediary between bureaucrats and applicants. In Septemberelected member of Karnataka's legislative assembly Janardhana Reddy, was arrested on charges of corruption and illegal mining of iron ore in his home state.
The executive and the legislature of course have a vital role to play in the multifaceted task of governance, but in a federal set-up, it is the judiciary that holds the balance.
Among the causes of the scandalous delay are the complicated court procedures, the needlessly lengthy and adjournments generally sought by the lawyers themselves in order to enhance their incomesthe heavy pressure of work necessitating long intervals between hearings, the facility of lodging appeals to high courts, the inadequate number of judges and the numerous holidays.
Veeraswami Case This case is important in many ways. By Santynirvaan Views Judicial corruption has been document in India and throughout the world.
Judiciary and its working in india essay
This of course encourages the corrupt judges further. They do not work, they are worked. The merits of the case and applicable law are not paramount in corrupt judiciaries, but rather the status of the parties and the benefit judges and court personnel derive from their decisions. This indicate severe lack of public confidence in the ability of the anti-corruption agencies to probe a complaint of corruption, collect evidence and put the case up for trial. The World Bank study finds that the public distribution programmes and social spending contracts have proven to be a waste due to corruption. Inaccesibility The judicial system is highly dilatory, expensive, and beyond the reach of the common man. For , the Union budget allocated a meagre Rs 1, crore to the judiciary — about 0.
Justice Stephen Breyer explained the importance of an independent judiciary and the role of judges in the following way: George Washington claimed that "the true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.
The living conditions and economic status of some judges are started to pathetic. The system must recognize that it is such a Herculean task even to raise a suspicion of integrity against a judge without risking contempt proceedings, that when significant evidence of corruption somehow adds up against a judge, there simply has to be a workable impeachment process.
The first inference implies that the current system is person dependent.
How can we say that judiciary in india is the most powerful
The merits of the case and applicable law are not paramount in corrupt judiciaries, but rather the status of the parties and the benefit judges and court personnel derive from their decisions. This is for the first time that power conferred by Veeraswami case is exercised by any CJI. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, seeks to prevent money laundering including laundering of property through corruption and provides for confiscation of such a property. Many High Court judges are facing charges of corruption. There seems to be a nexus between the sudden fall in the credibility of the judiciary and the increasing politicization of the process of appointment of judges in which lobbying in the corridors of power rather than knowledge of law and character was found to be quite effective. Let me elaborate these points. Most governments have some other type of investigation for lesser judicial misconduct. Third, even when a charge is all but proven, we have no working mechanism to impeach a member of the higher judiciary. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing. In Supreme Court Judge v Justice Remaswamy's case the inquiry indicted him but the impeachment motion fell through in parliament in
The bar can also have an investigation department within the bar association, which would have power to disbar lawyers for unethical conduct with judges.
based on 97 review